[whatwg] Interpretation issue: can <section> be used for "extended paragraphs"?
Jukka K. Korpela
jkorpela at cs.tut.fi
Thu Mar 10 00:20:32 PST 2011
The <p> element (ever since it became an element) has always allowed inline
(text-level) content only, and no change is planned to this in HTML5. Under
these circumstances, what should we say to people to need to use paragraphs
that contain lists, for example?
A paragraph, in the old typographic sense, may contain lists. A sentence in
the text may continue with list items, displayed e.g. as a bulleted list. So
the list breaks the paragraph as a block of text but not logically - the
list items are part of the sentence just as they would be if they were just
mentioned in the text, for example using 1) numbers in the text, 2) letters
in the text, or 3) no special notation.
The HTML(5) paragraph concept is different, so in HTML terms, such a
paragraph would need to consist of a P element followed by a UL (or OL)
element. There is an apparent need for indicating in markup that the two
belong to together,
a) for styling purposes (you need a container element so that you can
specify, without clumsily using classes on both the P and the UL, e.g. that
vertical spacing be reduced or zero)
b) to ease handling in scripts
c) to act as documentation in the source code, warning future editors of the
document that neither the P element nor the UL element should be edited in
isolation but only considering the other part as well.
There are less apparent needs, or possibilities, too - e.g.,
1) to communicate to any interested software that the elements are coupled,
treating occurrences of a word as occurring in the same "extended paragraph"
for the purposes of indexing, searching, etc.,
2) to tell a grammar checker that the P element just _appears_ to end
3) to inform editing software that e.g. triple-clicking the paragraph, for
the purpose of moving it elsewhere, should also select the UL element.
I guess some of these needs, especially the most practical (in a sense)
styling issue, could be addressed by simply putting the P and UL elements
inside a SECTION element:
<p>Sometimes a paragraph isn't just a paragraph but continues with a list
<li>a bulleted list
<li>a numbered list
<li>a list constructed in some other way.
(I know that the period at the end of the last item violates English style
rules. But it is allowed and even required by style rules of other
languages, and at the logical level, it really belongs there -
grammatically, the last sentence of the paragraph really ends there, not
My question is: Is this acceptable use of the SECTION element, even in a
flow that mostly consists of P elements, not wrapped inside SECTION elements
of their own? That is, can we use, e.g. within the BODY or within a SECTION,
"mixed content" in the sense that it partly has P elements as direct
descendants, partly has them wrapped in SECTION elements that are basically
just "extended paragraphs"? Or should DIV markup be used instead?
Should this even be mentioned, descriptively, as a common use case, or as an
example of inappropriate use, depending on the position that will be taken?
More information about the whatwg