[html5] r6438 - [e] (0) remove paragraph since it has many problems and it's not clear what it w [...]

Fri Aug 12 14:59:06 PDT 2011

Author: ianh
Date: 2011-08-12 14:59:04 -0700 (Fri, 12 Aug 2011)
New Revision: 6438

Modified:
   complete.html
   index
   source
Log:
[e] (0) remove paragraph since it has many problems and it's not clear what it was supposed to mean
Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12484

Modified: complete.html
===================================================================

--- complete.html	2011-08-12 21:57:35 UTC (rev 6437)
+++ complete.html	2011-08-12 21:59:04 UTC (rev 6438)
@@ -3407,11 +3407,6 @@
   would imply that documents are not allowed to contain elements named
   <code title="">foobar</code>.</p>
 
-<!-- The following paragraph is not included in the WHATWG copy
-because it is wrong. For example, content models are not syntax. It's
-also unnecessary. What kinds of things are conformance requirements is
-explained in the previous section, which talks about RFC 2119. -->
-
   <p class="note impl">There is no implied relationship between
   document conformance requirements and implementation conformance
   requirements. User agents are not free to handle non-conformant

Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index	2011-08-12 21:57:35 UTC (rev 6437)
+++ index	2011-08-12 21:59:04 UTC (rev 6438)
@@ -3304,11 +3304,6 @@
   would imply that documents are not allowed to contain elements named
   <code title="">foobar</code>.</p>
 
-<!-- The following paragraph is not included in the WHATWG copy
-because it is wrong. For example, content models are not syntax. It's
-also unnecessary. What kinds of things are conformance requirements is
-explained in the previous section, which talks about RFC 2119. -->
-
   <p class="note impl">There is no implied relationship between
   document conformance requirements and implementation conformance
   requirements. User agents are not free to handle non-conformant

Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source	2011-08-12 21:57:35 UTC (rev 6437)
+++ source	2011-08-12 21:59:04 UTC (rev 6438)
@@ -2276,18 +2276,6 @@
   would imply that documents are not allowed to contain elements named
   <code title="">foobar</code>.</p>
 
-<!-- The following paragraph is not included in the WHATWG copy
-because it is wrong. For example, content models are not syntax. It's
-also unnecessary. What kinds of things are conformance requirements is
-explained in the previous section, which talks about RFC 2119. -->
-<!--END html--><!--END dev-html--><!--END complete--><!--END epub--><!--CONFORMANCE--><!--FORK-->
-  <p class="note">the conformance requirements for documents include
-  syntax (the <table> element is conforming as a child of
-  <body>, but not as a child ot <title>), and semantics (the
-  <table> elements denotes a multi-dimensional data table, not a
-  piece of furniture).</p>
-<!--START html--><!--START dev-html--><!--START complete--><!--START epub--><!--CONFORMANCE--><!--FORK-->
-
   <p class="note impl">There is no implied relationship between
   document conformance requirements and implementation conformance
   requirements. User agents are not free to handle non-conformant


