Matthew Raymond wrote: > If this is acceptable, does this negate the value of a potential > "3d" context for <canvas> in XHTML? Presumably X3D:3D canvas is equivalent to SVG:2D canvas. -- "But if science you say still sounds too deep, Just do what Beaker does, just shrug and 'Meep!'" -- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew & Beaker of Muppet Labs