[whatwg] [WA1] The a element could be empty
jim.ley at gmail.com
Sun Sep 4 16:17:51 PDT 2005
On 9/5/05, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
> None of which are obvious to the average user.
but quite obvious to people who use the IEAK to customise IE's for
corporate roll outs...
> > I never realised FF was so flawed, thanks for correcting me.
> Is it a flaw?
Definately, if you disable stylesheets, you should disable
stylesheets, just disabling particular media ones is flawed.
> > I couldn't see the relevance of browsers which didn't support both, as
> > disabled CSS is equivalent for the purposes at discussion.
> have a CSS-capable browser,
no relationship between the 2 things. Don't fall in the trap of
thinking we're specifying things for the standard configurations of
current browsers - that's how you make the web more inaccessible for
> order to hide the button when printing.
This has never been what I've been discussing - the hiding of the
button is when script is disabled or printing functionality not there
- it's got nothing to do with hiding the button when it is printed,
it's purely to do with not having a control on the screen which does
> I can't find that recommendation in CSS1.
It's at the end of section 7
>As a matter of fact, I
> don't think CSS1 has media types or print-specific properties.
no, it's purely talking about disabling css.
More information about the whatwg