[whatwg] Basic assumption about text/html parsing
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Feb 24 16:02:31 PST 2006
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Is it the intent of WHAT WG to specify text/html parsing in such a way
> that for each WHAT WG-conforming text/html document there exists (in the
> mathematical sense) exactly one equivalent canonicalized (in the XML
> c14n sense) XHTML document?
That isn't a design goal, but off the top of my head I don't see any
reason why this wouldn't be the case, except if you include comparing the
result of the parsing the document with scripting enable vs disabled.
> (Also, it would be cool to have a test suite of text/html docs and their
> canonical XHTML equivalents.)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg