[whatwg] [wf2] :read-write pseudoclass description issue

[Rikkert Koppes]

Ah

Let me rephrase the proposal:
replace
  "A disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are 
orthogonal."
with
  "A disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the disabled 
and read-write states are orthogonal."

current description could fool more people :)

Regards,
Rikkert Koppes

Anne van Kesteren schreef:
> Quoting Rikkert Koppes <rikkert at finalist.com>:
>   
>>     [...] A
>>     disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are
>>     orthogonal.
>>
>> I believe the term "orthogonal" is incorrect here.
>>     
>
> :read-write is orthogonal to :disabled. That's correct.
>
>
>