[whatwg] Why is the legend element not categorized as flow content?
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Mar 29 13:27:05 PDT 2010
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, divya manian wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > In what sense is it listed under phrasing content?
> The content model for the legend is stated as phrasing content in the
> spec 
Oh it can contain phrasing content, yes. I thought you meant it was
phrasing content itself. Sorry.
> > It's just supposed to be a child of <fieldset>, so it doesn't have any
> > category at all.
> Thanks, the general rule  that is given in the spec seems to include
> almost every known HTML4 element as flow content, but then, legend
> somehow is not a flow content (even though it fulfills the General
>  "should have either at least one descendant text node that is not
> inter-element whitespace, or at least one descendant element node that
> is embedded content"
I think you are misreading this. It's not saying that anything that
contains text is a flow content element, it's saying that anything that is
a flow content element is supposed to contain text.
> I am trying to figure out if there is an easy way to know which elements
> are flow or not other than referring to the spec for each element before
You can refer to the index:
It lists all the elements in each category.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg