<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Jim Ley wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid851c8d3105010507174bc84fdf@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:19:17 -0500, Matthew Raymond
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mattraymond@earthlink.net"><mattraymond@earthlink.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">...should look like this...
<img src="image.png">
What are everyone's thoughts on this?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
It makes quality assurance harder, since visual indication of alt is
not obvious from testing, automated scripts are used which can easily
ensure that no alt attributes that are needed are missed. Making it
implied makes this harder.
It also makes user agents that use the absense of an alt attribute a
trigger for fix up behaviour unable to tell when it should carry out
the fix up, either leading it to not bother attempting it or to
attempt it so aggressively that it has to spend loads of time on doing
it on each and every image.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I've never written automated scripts that test HTML pages, nor have I
written a UA, but in my experience, I've never seen a UA that rejected
a page because an <img> tag was missing an alt attribute. So, in
existing UAs, is it not already the case that alt is implied? <br>
<br>
</body>
</html>