<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Ian Hickson wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.61.0501311501020.9893@dhalsim.dreamhost.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Daniel Brooks wrote:
</pre>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">6.2: why specify that image controls are treated as two controls with specific
names if they're just going to be skipped? (step 4, paragraphs 3 and 4). The
same thing is specified for form submission, because that's where it matters.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Because even though they are skipped, they still need to be counted, so
that the index values in the submission step match the index values in the
seeding step.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ah, that makes sense. Perhaps a single sentance that states that they
are counted as two form controls just like is described elsewhere (with
a reference), but that they are otherwise skipped.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.61.0501311501020.9893@dhalsim.dreamhost.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">8.1: :indeterminate — what good is it? If it's defined in a different
standard and you're clarifying how it interacts with this one, perhaps a note
to that effect?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
The first paragraph of that section already says that, no?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
So it does.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.61.0501311501020.9893@dhalsim.dreamhost.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2.15: 'form script' => 'for scripts'
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I couldn't find this error.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ah, it's in the third paragraph, but now that I read it again I see
that it says 'from script', not 'form script', so I guess it's ok, but
'for a script' or 'for scripts' would be easier to read. The whole
sentance is "There is no way from script to detect this situation
because that would open the way for some privacy or security leaks."<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.61.0501311501020.9893@dhalsim.dreamhost.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">5.6: grammar? 'In the tables below, cells that specify that the case
should be handled as another represent cases where the given attribute
combinations are otherwise meaningless. In such cases, the encoded data
set is created from the fallback encoding type, not the specified
encoding type.' This just feels awkward. Had to read it several times to
figure out what it means.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I tried to simplify it. Not sure really what to do though.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">5.6.1: combine put and post columns as in previous table
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Apparently you didn't figure out what the note you mentioned above meant. :-)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
They both make a lot more sense this morning, so I don't have any
objection to them now :)<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
db48x<br>
</body>
</html>