<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><BR><DIV><DIV>On Jun 11, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV><B>Maciej Stachowiak wrote:<BR></B></DIV><BLOCKQUOTE style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"><PRE>I think the <BR>Google Gears design for this works better than the Mozilla design,
<BR>because it lets offline mode use all the same URIs as regular mode, <BR>so the offline support can be cleanly factored from the rest of the <BR>web app.</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>It's not that bad, if your app avoids using URIs with protocol or domain in them. As a proof of concept we modified Zimbra to use our API; we just put its files into a JAR and things worked. <BR clear="all"><BR>Having said that, it would certainly be nice to be able to get some kind of consistency without JARs.<BR><BLOCKQUOTE style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"> <PRE>I think we should discuss the right standards approach <BR>further, though I'm somewhat surprised that Mozilla hasn't brought <BR>their work so far to the standards process before now.<BR></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE> Sorry ... first we wanted to get some experience with the API, then we were busy. So do you have any comments on Dave's doc?<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Dave's doc (along with Google's docs for Gears) is on my queue of things to review, but probably next week since this week is Apple's World Wide Developer Conference.<BR></DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>Cheers,</DIV><DIV>Maciej</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><BR></BODY></HTML>