<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1197654764.6729.46.camel@a1dmin.vola.spe.com.pl"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Again, a false presumption. This was discussed in the context of the
HTML WG at the W3C. Those doors are not closed.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Really? Does that mean I can claim a seat on the board? Where is this discussion about a public standard made public if
not here? Please provide a link to these open discussions and I'll concede your point (and join - it is public, and free
right?)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!----></pre>
</blockquote>
Ok so I found the other list (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:public-html@w3c.org">public-html@w3c.org</a>). Nokia state their
reasons and clearly it was discussed (at Cambridge apparently) but why
two lists for one standard?<br>
<br>
<br>
Shannon
</body>
</html>