On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Jens Meiert <<a href="mailto:jens@meiert.com">jens@meiert.com</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">> The point of <abbr> is to expand the acronym, not to just mark up what is<br>
> an acryonym or abbreviation.<br>
<br>
</div>Doesn't this claim that the general information that some text is an<br>
abbreviation (w/o an expanded form) is basically useless? And is<br>
"<abbr>ISS</abbr>" not more useful since less ambiguous than "ISS"<br>
(same abbreviation) and "ISS" (German imperative for "to eat" in<br>
capitals), and be it just for AT, pronunciation and a scent of<br>
semantics?<br>
</blockquote><div>I'd agree that it *is* basically useless. You can infer that something is an acronym from context - that's how we operate when reading anything else, after all!<br><br>The ambiguity of some acronyms with actual words is, I would think, far less of a problem than the ambiguity of honest-to-god homographs in our natural languages, which we can generally deal with just fine.<br>
<br>Plus, who actually wants to mark up every instance of an abbreviation? That's a ton of work for next to no reward, and apparently isn't something that can be automated (since there are conflicts between abbreviations and actual words). Mark it up once to expand it, and if you want to refer to the original abbreviation again, give it an id and link to it.<br>
</div></div><br>~TJ<br>