<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Dave Singer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:singer@apple.com">singer@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div>Caching is on a full URL basis, of course. Once that is
decided, then yes, I think that pre-cached items for a given URL are
in the general cache for that site.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>A site that uses this feature is likely to be fragile. It will have to have z.html both in the archive and available directly from the server, in case z.html is requested before the load of the archive has finished. And if those copies ever get out of sync you're in very big trouble, because depending on the context, either the archive version or the direct version is likely to consistently win the load race, so just occasionally some clients will get the wrong version. This seems like a highly error-prone design.<br>
<br>Rob<br></div></div>-- <br>"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]<br>
</div>