<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6001.18148" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>Grouping and such is a stylistic concern, though - as long as the
document expresses a footnote semantic, that's all it has to do. For the
rest, we have a CSS Module that will cover that area, the Generated and
Replaced Content module [1]. By an astonishing coincidence, the editor
of this module is no less than Ian himself.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>[1]: <A
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/">http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/</A></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>~TJ</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In that case why don't they drop the abbr, dfn,
cite, mark etc. elements? They can be styled through CSS as well and be
semantically determined by using a class-name just as sugested for footnotes.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bert</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>