On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Ian Hickson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ian@hixie.ch">ian@hixie.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div>Every codec has the same problem; the difference is that companies like<br></div>
Apple have already taken on the patent risk with MPEG-LA licensed codecs<br>
and are not willing to double their exposure. (Other companies like Google<br>
apparently _are_ willing to take this risk.)<br>
</blockquote><div> </div></div>It's not a doubling of exposure to submarine patents; there is only increased exposure for techniques that are used by Ogg Theora and NOT by H.264 etc, which isn't much AFAIK.<br><br>
Although maybe there are other factors; perhaps the MPEG-LA has a response plan to submarine patents on its codecs that gives comfort to its licensees.<br><br>Anyway, it's fruitless to speculate on companies' motives. We can never really know.<br>
<br>Rob<br>-- <br>"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]<br>