On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:37 AM, SA Alfonso Baqueiro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:abaqueiro@gmail.com">abaqueiro@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
In the lack of agreement.<br><br>Instead of removing the video section from the spec, we should be DEMOCRATIC, the codec that more vendors support should get in the spec, like the goverments are elected.<br><br>In this case Ogg Theora will be suported by 3 vendors except Safari, so 3 vs 1, it should get in. The case of H.264 has no majority to be supported.<br>
<br>The whatwg has power, if the standard says something the vendors will have to implement it to stay on the edge<br>they have no reason to not do it, more when the the codec of ogg is open and the source code implementation is out there.<br>
<br>OPEN IS KING.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>This has been discussed to death. Your exact point has already been made and responded to several times. Please read the archives.<br><br>J<br>