<br><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Anne van Kesteren <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:annevk@opera.com" target="_blank">annevk@opera.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:10:52 +0200, Drew Wilson <<a href="mailto:atwilson@google.com" target="_blank">atwilson@google.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Not sure what you are suggesting, Anne - it sounds like they want to tie<br>
> the AppCache to a specific cookie/value combination, which I don't believe is<br>
> supported by the current spec.<br>
<br>
</div>Well, as far as I can tell cookies are part of the request to the manifest file so you could serve up a different one from the server based on cookie data.</blockquote><div> </div><div>That's an interesting idea (send down a different manifest), although I don't see how you'd leverage that technique to support two different users/manifests and use the appropriate app cache depending on which user is logged in.</div>
<div><br></div><div><div>I think this boils down to "the Gears 'requiredCookie' attribute was really useful".</div><div><br></div></div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Is the problem supporting multiple users completely client-side? I can see how that might not work very well.<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, I think that's the use case they are trying to support - offline access to web apps where any one of multiple users can log in. I have to say that I'm somewhat fuzzy on the precise use case, though.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div>Anne van Kesteren<br>
<a href="http://annevankesteren.nl/" target="_blank">http://annevankesteren.nl/</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>