[html5] r4085 - [c] (0) Clarify that 'authors must' and 'documents must' are to be considered eq [...]
whatwg at whatwg.org
whatwg at whatwg.org
Mon Oct 5 16:44:37 PDT 2009
Author: ianh
Date: 2009-10-05 16:44:36 -0700 (Mon, 05 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 4085
Modified:
index
source
Log:
[c] (0) Clarify that 'authors must' and 'documents must' are to be considered equivalent.
Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index 2009-10-05 23:39:07 UTC (rev 4084)
+++ index 2009-10-05 23:44:36 UTC (rev 4085)
@@ -2117,7 +2117,12 @@
into two categories: those describing content model restrictions,
and those describing implementation behavior. Those in the former
category are requirements on documents and authoring tools. Those in
- the second category are requirements on user agents.</p>
+ the second category are requirements on user agents. Similarly, some
+ conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on authors;
+ such requirements are to be interpreted as conformance requirements
+ on the documents that authors produce. (In other words, this
+ specification does not distinguish between conformance criteria on
+ authors and conformance criteria on documents.)</p>
<p>Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps
may be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is
@@ -74432,6 +74437,7 @@
Jon Gibbins,
Jon Perlow,
Jonas Sicking,
+ Jonathan Rees,
Jonathan Worent,
Jonny Axelsson,
Jorgen Horstink,
Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source 2009-10-05 23:39:07 UTC (rev 4084)
+++ source 2009-10-05 23:44:36 UTC (rev 4085)
@@ -1156,7 +1156,12 @@
into two categories: those describing content model restrictions,
and those describing implementation behavior. Those in the former
category are requirements on documents and authoring tools. Those in
- the second category are requirements on user agents.</p>
+ the second category are requirements on user agents. Similarly, some
+ conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on authors;
+ such requirements are to be interpreted as conformance requirements
+ on the documents that authors produce. (In other words, this
+ specification does not distinguish between conformance criteria on
+ authors and conformance criteria on documents.)</p>
<p>Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps
may be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is
@@ -91553,6 +91558,7 @@
Jon Gibbins,
Jon Perlow,
Jonas Sicking,
+ Jonathan Rees,
Jonathan Worent,
Jonny Axelsson,
Jorgen Horstink,
More information about the Commit-Watchers
mailing list