[html5] r4085 - [c] (0) Clarify that 'authors must' and 'documents must' are to be considered eq [...]

whatwg at whatwg.org whatwg at whatwg.org
Mon Oct 5 16:44:37 PDT 2009


Author: ianh
Date: 2009-10-05 16:44:36 -0700 (Mon, 05 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 4085

Modified:
   index
   source
Log:
[c] (0) Clarify that 'authors must' and 'documents must' are to be considered equivalent.

Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index	2009-10-05 23:39:07 UTC (rev 4084)
+++ index	2009-10-05 23:44:36 UTC (rev 4085)
@@ -2117,7 +2117,12 @@
   into two categories: those describing content model restrictions,
   and those describing implementation behavior. Those in the former
   category are requirements on documents and authoring tools. Those in
-  the second category are requirements on user agents.</p>
+  the second category are requirements on user agents. Similarly, some
+  conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on authors;
+  such requirements are to be interpreted as conformance requirements
+  on the documents that authors produce. (In other words, this
+  specification does not distinguish between conformance criteria on
+  authors and conformance criteria on documents.)</p>
 
   <p>Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps
   may be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is
@@ -74432,6 +74437,7 @@
   Jon Gibbins,
   Jon Perlow,
   Jonas Sicking,
+  Jonathan Rees,
   Jonathan Worent,
   Jonny Axelsson,
   Jorgen Horstink,

Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source	2009-10-05 23:39:07 UTC (rev 4084)
+++ source	2009-10-05 23:44:36 UTC (rev 4085)
@@ -1156,7 +1156,12 @@
   into two categories: those describing content model restrictions,
   and those describing implementation behavior. Those in the former
   category are requirements on documents and authoring tools. Those in
-  the second category are requirements on user agents.</p>
+  the second category are requirements on user agents. Similarly, some
+  conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on authors;
+  such requirements are to be interpreted as conformance requirements
+  on the documents that authors produce. (In other words, this
+  specification does not distinguish between conformance criteria on
+  authors and conformance criteria on documents.)</p>
 
   <p>Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps
   may be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is
@@ -91553,6 +91558,7 @@
   Jon Gibbins,
   Jon Perlow,
   Jonas Sicking,
+  Jonathan Rees,
   Jonathan Worent,
   Jonny Axelsson,
   Jorgen Horstink,




More information about the Commit-Watchers mailing list