[html5] r4279 - [c] (0) Encourage better error messages from validators for ARIA issues.
whatwg at whatwg.org
whatwg at whatwg.org
Thu Oct 22 18:03:00 PDT 2009
Author: ianh
Date: 2009-10-22 18:02:56 -0700 (Thu, 22 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 4279
Modified:
complete.html
index
source
Log:
[c] (0) Encourage better error messages from validators for ARIA issues.
Modified: complete.html
===================================================================
--- complete.html 2009-10-23 00:54:09 UTC (rev 4278)
+++ complete.html 2009-10-23 01:02:56 UTC (rev 4279)
@@ -9532,6 +9532,15 @@
elements</a> in a manner more fine-grained than possible with the
above definitions.</p>
+ <p>Conformance checkers are encouraged to phrase errors such that
+ authors are encouraged to use more appropriate elements rather than
+ remove accessibility annotations. For example, if an <code><a href=#the-a-element>a</a></code>
+ element is marked as having the <code title=attr-aria-role-button>button</code> role, a conformance
+ checker could say "Either a <code><a href=#the-button-element>button</a></code> element or an
+ <code><a href=#the-input-element>input</a></code> element is required to when using the <code title=attr-aria-role-button>button</code> role" rather than "The
+ <code title=attr-aria-role-button>button</code> role cannot be
+ used with <code><a href=#the-a-element>a</a></code> elements".</p>
+
</div>
Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index 2009-10-23 00:54:09 UTC (rev 4278)
+++ index 2009-10-23 01:02:56 UTC (rev 4279)
@@ -9362,6 +9362,15 @@
elements</a> in a manner more fine-grained than possible with the
above definitions.</p>
+ <p>Conformance checkers are encouraged to phrase errors such that
+ authors are encouraged to use more appropriate elements rather than
+ remove accessibility annotations. For example, if an <code><a href=#the-a-element>a</a></code>
+ element is marked as having the <code title=attr-aria-role-button>button</code> role, a conformance
+ checker could say "Either a <code><a href=#the-button-element>button</a></code> element or an
+ <code><a href=#the-input-element>input</a></code> element is required to when using the <code title=attr-aria-role-button>button</code> role" rather than "The
+ <code title=attr-aria-role-button>button</code> role cannot be
+ used with <code><a href=#the-a-element>a</a></code> elements".</p>
+
</div>
Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source 2009-10-23 00:54:09 UTC (rev 4278)
+++ source 2009-10-23 01:02:56 UTC (rev 4279)
@@ -9677,6 +9677,17 @@
elements</span> in a manner more fine-grained than possible with the
above definitions.</p>
+ <p>Conformance checkers are encouraged to phrase errors such that
+ authors are encouraged to use more appropriate elements rather than
+ remove accessibility annotations. For example, if an <code>a</code>
+ element is marked as having the <code
+ title="attr-aria-role-button">button</code> role, a conformance
+ checker could say "Either a <code>button</code> element or an
+ <code>input</code> element is required to when using the <code
+ title="attr-aria-role-button">button</code> role" rather than "The
+ <code title="attr-aria-role-button">button</code> role cannot be
+ used with <code>a</code> elements".</p>
+
</div>
More information about the Commit-Watchers
mailing list