[html5] r4673 - [e] (0) Make the note more pedantically correct, since there are parse error dif [...]
whatwg at whatwg.org
whatwg at whatwg.org
Fri Feb 5 16:23:53 PST 2010
Author: ianh
Date: 2010-02-05 16:23:51 -0800 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
New Revision: 4673
Modified:
complete.html
index
source
Log:
[e] (0) Make the note more pedantically correct, since there are parse error differences, it turns out.
Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8699
Modified: complete.html
===================================================================
--- complete.html 2010-02-06 00:14:51 UTC (rev 4672)
+++ complete.html 2010-02-06 00:23:51 UTC (rev 4673)
@@ -78052,12 +78052,13 @@
<dd>Leave the tokenizer in the <a href=#data-state>data state</a>.</dd>
</dl><p class=note>For performance reasons, an implementation that
- uses the actual state machine described in this specification
- directly could use the PLAINTEXT state instead of the RAWTEXT
- and script data states where those are mentioned in the list
- above. They are equivalent, since there is no <a href=#appropriate-end-tag-token>appropriate
- end tag token</a> in the fragment case, but involve far fewer
- state transitions.</p>
+ does not report errors and that uses the actual state machine
+ described in this specification directly could use the PLAINTEXT
+ state instead of the RAWTEXT and script data states where those
+ are mentioned in the list above. Except for rules regarding
+ parse errors, they are equivalent, since there is no
+ <a href=#appropriate-end-tag-token>appropriate end tag token</a> in the fragment case, yet
+ they involve far fewer state transitions.</p>
</li>
Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index 2010-02-06 00:14:51 UTC (rev 4672)
+++ index 2010-02-06 00:23:51 UTC (rev 4673)
@@ -72347,12 +72347,13 @@
<dd>Leave the tokenizer in the <a href=#data-state>data state</a>.</dd>
</dl><p class=note>For performance reasons, an implementation that
- uses the actual state machine described in this specification
- directly could use the PLAINTEXT state instead of the RAWTEXT
- and script data states where those are mentioned in the list
- above. They are equivalent, since there is no <a href=#appropriate-end-tag-token>appropriate
- end tag token</a> in the fragment case, but involve far fewer
- state transitions.</p>
+ does not report errors and that uses the actual state machine
+ described in this specification directly could use the PLAINTEXT
+ state instead of the RAWTEXT and script data states where those
+ are mentioned in the list above. Except for rules regarding
+ parse errors, they are equivalent, since there is no
+ <a href=#appropriate-end-tag-token>appropriate end tag token</a> in the fragment case, yet
+ they involve far fewer state transitions.</p>
</li>
Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source 2010-02-06 00:14:51 UTC (rev 4672)
+++ source 2010-02-06 00:23:51 UTC (rev 4673)
@@ -89074,12 +89074,13 @@
</dl>
<p class="note">For performance reasons, an implementation that
- uses the actual state machine described in this specification
- directly could use the PLAINTEXT state instead of the RAWTEXT
- and script data states where those are mentioned in the list
- above. They are equivalent, since there is no <span>appropriate
- end tag token</span> in the fragment case, but involve far fewer
- state transitions.</p>
+ does not report errors and that uses the actual state machine
+ described in this specification directly could use the PLAINTEXT
+ state instead of the RAWTEXT and script data states where those
+ are mentioned in the list above. Except for rules regarding
+ parse errors, they are equivalent, since there is no
+ <span>appropriate end tag token</span> in the fragment case, yet
+ they involve far fewer state transitions.</p>
</li>
More information about the Commit-Watchers
mailing list