[html5] r4860 - [ac] (0) W3C HTML WG ISSUE-79 change proposal merge Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bug [...]

whatwg at whatwg.org whatwg at whatwg.org
Tue Mar 23 00:12:04 PDT 2010


Author: ianh
Date: 2010-03-23 00:12:02 -0700 (Tue, 23 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 4860

Modified:
   complete.html
   index
   source
Log:
[ac] (0) W3C HTML WG ISSUE-79 change proposal merge
Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7525

Modified: complete.html
===================================================================
--- complete.html	2010-03-23 02:09:34 UTC (rev 4859)
+++ complete.html	2010-03-23 07:12:02 UTC (rev 4860)
@@ -11527,6 +11527,27 @@
 
    </dd>
 
+   <dt><dfn id=meta-keywords title=meta-keywords><code>keywords</code></dfn></dt>
+
+   <dd>
+
+    <p>Contains a comma-separated list of keywords relevant to the page.</p>
+
+    <p>Note that many search engines have stopped to consider keyword
+    information as relevant because it has been used unreliably or even
+    misleading. Recipients are recommended to use this information only
+    when there's sufficient confidence in the reliability of this
+    information, for instance in controlled environments such as sites
+    generated from a content management system.</p>
+
+    <p class=XXX>The text above is not in the right form for the
+    spec (no conformance criteria, the note uses the wrong writing
+    style, no examples, uses the wrong terminology for consistency
+    with this spec, etc), but is what the working group agreed. It
+    will be fixed momentarily.</p>
+
+   </dd>
+
   </dl><h5 id=other-metadata-names><span class=secno>4.2.5.2 </span>Other metadata names</h5>
 
   <p><dfn id=concept-meta-extensions title=concept-meta-extensions>Extensions to the predefined

Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index	2010-03-23 02:09:34 UTC (rev 4859)
+++ index	2010-03-23 07:12:02 UTC (rev 4860)
@@ -11426,6 +11426,27 @@
 
    </dd>
 
+   <dt><dfn id=meta-keywords title=meta-keywords><code>keywords</code></dfn></dt>
+
+   <dd>
+
+    <p>Contains a comma-separated list of keywords relevant to the page.</p>
+
+    <p>Note that many search engines have stopped to consider keyword
+    information as relevant because it has been used unreliably or even
+    misleading. Recipients are recommended to use this information only
+    when there's sufficient confidence in the reliability of this
+    information, for instance in controlled environments such as sites
+    generated from a content management system.</p>
+
+    <p class=XXX>The text above is not in the right form for the
+    spec (no conformance criteria, the note uses the wrong writing
+    style, no examples, uses the wrong terminology for consistency
+    with this spec, etc), but is what the working group agreed. It
+    will be fixed momentarily.</p>
+
+   </dd>
+
   </dl><h5 id=other-metadata-names><span class=secno>4.2.5.2 </span>Other metadata names</h5>
 
   <p><dfn id=concept-meta-extensions title=concept-meta-extensions>Extensions to the predefined

Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source	2010-03-23 02:09:34 UTC (rev 4859)
+++ source	2010-03-23 07:12:02 UTC (rev 4860)
@@ -11971,6 +11971,27 @@
 
    </dd>
 
+   <dt><dfn title="meta-keywords"><code>keywords</code></dfn></dt>
+
+   <dd>
+
+    <p>Contains a comma-separated list of keywords relevant to the page.</p>
+
+    <p>Note that many search engines have stopped to consider keyword
+    information as relevant because it has been used unreliably or even
+    misleading. Recipients are recommended to use this information only
+    when there's sufficient confidence in the reliability of this
+    information, for instance in controlled environments such as sites
+    generated from a content management system.</p>
+
+    <p class="XXX">The text above is not in the right form for the
+    spec (no conformance criteria, the note uses the wrong writing
+    style, no examples, uses the wrong terminology for consistency
+    with this spec, etc), but is what the working group agreed. It
+    will be fixed momentarily.</p>
+
+   </dd>
+
   </dl>
 
 




More information about the Commit-Watchers mailing list