[html5] r6994 - [e] (0) Remove a paragraph from the W3C copy on chair request. Fixing https://ww [...]

whatwg at whatwg.org whatwg at whatwg.org
Tue Feb 14 12:29:03 PST 2012


Author: ianh
Date: 2012-02-14 12:29:01 -0800 (Tue, 14 Feb 2012)
New Revision: 6994

Modified:
   complete.html
   index
   source
Log:
[e] (0) Remove a paragraph from the W3C copy on chair request.
Fixing https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13903
Affected topics: HTML

Modified: complete.html
===================================================================
--- complete.html	2012-02-13 22:53:20 UTC (rev 6993)
+++ complete.html	2012-02-14 20:29:01 UTC (rev 6994)
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
 
   <header class=head id=head><p><a class=logo href=http://www.whatwg.org/><img alt=WHATWG height=101 src=/images/logo width=101></a></p>
    <hgroup><h1 class=allcaps>HTML</h1>
-    <h2 class="no-num no-toc">Living Standard — Last Updated 13 February 2012</h2>
+    <h2 class="no-num no-toc">Living Standard — Last Updated 14 February 2012</h2>
    </hgroup><dl><dt><strong>Web developer edition:</strong></dt>
     <dd><strong><a href=http://developers.whatwg.org/>http://developers.whatwg.org/</a></strong></dd>
     <dt>Multiple-page version:</dt>
@@ -1494,6 +1494,12 @@
    group chair request from February
    2012</a>.</li><!--HIDDENARIA--><!--FORK-->
 
+   <li>The W3C HTML specification does not define the term <a href=#rel-sidebar-hyperlink title=rel-sidebar-hyperlink>sidebar hyperlink</a>, forcing the
+   definition of the <code title=rel-sidebar>sidebar</code> link
+   type in the microformats wiki to rely on this copy of the spec
+   instead, because of a <a href=http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jan/0131.html>working
+   group chair decision from November 2011</a>.</li>
+
   </ul><p>The following sections are only published in the WHATWG
   specifications and are not currently available anywhere else:</p>
 
@@ -54603,14 +54609,22 @@
   new <a href=#browsing-context>browsing context</a>, it must be navigated with
   <a href=#replacement-enabled>replacement enabled</a>.</p>
 
-<!-- if http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 is ever reverted, then change the dfn below back into a span -->
-<!-- in the meantime, the definition of rel=sidebar in the wiki says that it's a "sidebar hyperlink" --> <!--!-->
+<!--FORK--><!--!-->
+<!-- If these bugs are ever reverted:
+        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 
+        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13903
+     ...then change the dfn below back into a span.
+     In the meantime, the definition of rel=sidebar in the wiki says
+     that it's a "sidebar hyperlink", and links to the WHATWG spec, so
+     that everything remains well-defined, at least if you ignore the
+     W3C specs. -->
   <p>Otherwise, if the hyperlink is a <dfn id=rel-sidebar-hyperlink title=rel-sidebar-hyperlink>sidebar hyperlink</dfn> and the user
   agent implements a feature that can be considered a <a href=#secondary-browsing-context>secondary
   browsing context</a>, such a <a href=#secondary-browsing-context>secondary browsing
   context</a> may be selected as the browsing context to be
   navigated.</p>
 
+
   <p>Otherwise, if the element is an <code><a href=#the-a-element>a</a></code> or
   <code><a href=#the-area-element>area</a></code> element with no <code title=attr-hyperlink-target><a href=#attr-hyperlink-target>target</a></code> attribute, but the
   <code><a href=#document>Document</a></code> contains a <code><a href=#the-base-element>base</a></code> element with a

Modified: index
===================================================================
--- index	2012-02-13 22:53:20 UTC (rev 6993)
+++ index	2012-02-14 20:29:01 UTC (rev 6994)
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
 
   <header class=head id=head><p><a class=logo href=http://www.whatwg.org/><img alt=WHATWG height=101 src=/images/logo width=101></a></p>
    <hgroup><h1 class=allcaps>HTML</h1>
-    <h2 class="no-num no-toc">Living Standard — Last Updated 13 February 2012</h2>
+    <h2 class="no-num no-toc">Living Standard — Last Updated 14 February 2012</h2>
    </hgroup><dl><dt><strong>Web developer edition:</strong></dt>
     <dd><strong><a href=http://developers.whatwg.org/>http://developers.whatwg.org/</a></strong></dd>
     <dt>Multiple-page version:</dt>
@@ -1494,6 +1494,12 @@
    group chair request from February
    2012</a>.</li><!--HIDDENARIA--><!--FORK-->
 
+   <li>The W3C HTML specification does not define the term <a href=#rel-sidebar-hyperlink title=rel-sidebar-hyperlink>sidebar hyperlink</a>, forcing the
+   definition of the <code title=rel-sidebar>sidebar</code> link
+   type in the microformats wiki to rely on this copy of the spec
+   instead, because of a <a href=http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jan/0131.html>working
+   group chair decision from November 2011</a>.</li>
+
   </ul><p>The following sections are only published in the WHATWG
   specifications and are not currently available anywhere else:</p>
 
@@ -54603,14 +54609,22 @@
   new <a href=#browsing-context>browsing context</a>, it must be navigated with
   <a href=#replacement-enabled>replacement enabled</a>.</p>
 
-<!-- if http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 is ever reverted, then change the dfn below back into a span -->
-<!-- in the meantime, the definition of rel=sidebar in the wiki says that it's a "sidebar hyperlink" --> <!--!-->
+<!--FORK--><!--!-->
+<!-- If these bugs are ever reverted:
+        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 
+        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13903
+     ...then change the dfn below back into a span.
+     In the meantime, the definition of rel=sidebar in the wiki says
+     that it's a "sidebar hyperlink", and links to the WHATWG spec, so
+     that everything remains well-defined, at least if you ignore the
+     W3C specs. -->
   <p>Otherwise, if the hyperlink is a <dfn id=rel-sidebar-hyperlink title=rel-sidebar-hyperlink>sidebar hyperlink</dfn> and the user
   agent implements a feature that can be considered a <a href=#secondary-browsing-context>secondary
   browsing context</a>, such a <a href=#secondary-browsing-context>secondary browsing
   context</a> may be selected as the browsing context to be
   navigated.</p>
 
+
   <p>Otherwise, if the element is an <code><a href=#the-a-element>a</a></code> or
   <code><a href=#the-area-element>area</a></code> element with no <code title=attr-hyperlink-target><a href=#attr-hyperlink-target>target</a></code> attribute, but the
   <code><a href=#document>Document</a></code> contains a <code><a href=#the-base-element>base</a></code> element with a

Modified: source
===================================================================
--- source	2012-02-13 22:53:20 UTC (rev 6993)
+++ source	2012-02-14 20:29:01 UTC (rev 6994)
@@ -233,6 +233,14 @@
    group chair request from February
    2012</a>.</li><!--HIDDENARIA--><!--FORK-->
 
+   <li>The W3C HTML specification does not define the term <span
+   title="rel-sidebar-hyperlink">sidebar hyperlink</span>, forcing the
+   definition of the <code title="rel-sidebar">sidebar</code> link
+   type in the microformats wiki to rely on this copy of the spec
+   instead, because of a <a
+   href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jan/0131.html">working
+   group chair decision from November 2011</a>.</li>
+
   </ul>
 
   <p>The following sections are only published in the WHATWG
@@ -63703,14 +63711,22 @@
   new <span>browsing context</span>, it must be navigated with
   <span>replacement enabled</span>.</p>
 
-<!-- if http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 is ever reverted, then change the dfn below back into a span -->
-<!-- in the meantime, the definition of rel=sidebar in the wiki says that it's a "sidebar hyperlink" --> <!--!-->
+<!--END w3c-html--><!--FORK--><!--!-->
+<!-- If these bugs are ever reverted:
+        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 
+        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13903
+     ...then change the dfn below back into a span.
+     In the meantime, the definition of rel=sidebar in the wiki says
+     that it's a "sidebar hyperlink", and links to the WHATWG spec, so
+     that everything remains well-defined, at least if you ignore the
+     W3C specs. -->
   <p>Otherwise, if the hyperlink is a <dfn
   title="rel-sidebar-hyperlink">sidebar hyperlink</dfn> and the user
   agent implements a feature that can be considered a <span>secondary
   browsing context</span>, such a <span>secondary browsing
   context</span> may be selected as the browsing context to be
   navigated.</p>
+<!--START w3c-html-->
 
   <p>Otherwise, if the element is an <code>a</code> or
   <code>area</code> element with no <code




More information about the Commit-Watchers mailing list