[html5] Distinguish main article from comments

[Richard Summers]

This <comments> debate has been going for a while now... I still think it¹s
valid too. I seem to remember that <comment> wasn¹t backwards comatible with
some early versions of IE? I liked the idea of having a <response> element.
This could also encompass other forms of responses, such as social media
responses (Tweets/whatever).

<article>
<p>This is the main story.</p>
  <response>
    <p>This is a response</p>
  </response>
  <response>
    <p>This is also a response</p>
  </response>
</article>


--
Rich


-- 
Rich Summers 
Dev Lead, Social Publishing Services
Audience Facing Services, Future Media & Technology
* BC4 D6, BBC Broadcast Centre | 201 Wood Lane | London | W12 7TP



On 23/11/2012 12:49, "Vahagn" <vahagnh at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Prof. T.D. Wilson <wilsontd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Section" is appropriate for the comments section of a blog, but a new tag
>> <comments> would be even more useful!
> 
> An alternative would be something like:
> 
>> > <section role="comments">
>> >   <ul>
>> >    <li></li>
>> >    .
>> >    .
>> >    .
>> >    <li></li>
>> >   <ul>
>> > </section>
> 
> Cheers,
> Vahagn
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help mailing list
> Help at lists.whatwg.org
> http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/help-whatwg.org


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
					
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/help-whatwg.org/attachments/20121123/908873a9/attachment-0003.htm>