[imps] HTML5 parser test location

Sam Ruby rubys at intertwingly.net
Mon Apr 7 18:14:29 PDT 2008

Ryan King wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 7:36 AM, James Graham wrote:
>> * I am totally against rewriting tests. The current tests have often  
>> been
>> written in response to actual regressions in software. Throwing away  
>> all that
>> knowledge of fragile points in the various implementations is  
>> unacceptable.
>> Adding extra tests is of course fine.
> I want to second this point. Almost all the tests I've written have  
> been to deal with issues discovered in the ruby implementation.

Is there some way we can segregate the tests into ones that we expect to 
pass and ones that we (currently) don't expect to pass?

- Sam Ruby

More information about the Implementors mailing list