[imps] HTML5 parser test location
rubys at intertwingly.net
Mon Apr 7 18:14:29 PDT 2008
Ryan King wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 7:36 AM, James Graham wrote:
>> * I am totally against rewriting tests. The current tests have often
>> written in response to actual regressions in software. Throwing away
>> all that
>> knowledge of fragile points in the various implementations is
>> Adding extra tests is of course fine.
> I want to second this point. Almost all the tests I've written have
> been to deal with issues discovered in the ruby implementation.
Is there some way we can segregate the tests into ones that we expect to
pass and ones that we (currently) don't expect to pass?
- Sam Ruby
More information about the Implementors