[whatwg] Suggested changes to Web Forms 2.0, 2004-07-01 working
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Aug 17 11:34:05 PDT 2004
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > As has been said from the very beginning, it must be possible to implement
> > these features in HTCs. This isn't new. We've been saying it since even
> > before WHATWG was announced, even.
> What if a feature from WF2 is not implementable in IE6?
> I'm concerned about file upload. I'm not sure its possible to upload
> files in other ways than using the "native" form-submission, which is
> always multipart/form-data and POST. This means that you cannot include
> file upload in xml-encoding, or with PUT in any encoding, and you cannot
> support single-file upload with arbitrary content-types.
> I may be wrong though, since some people is able to make IE do the
> impossible. In this case, however, it might be considered a security
> problem if someone were able to tamper with file upload, and the we run
> the risk of it being fixed in an update :-)
There are probably several things for which there is simply no way to have
a sane implementation in IE without Microsoft doing it. In those cases, I
guess we just have to put up with IE not having that feature. (The new
form submission formats do come to mind here.)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg