[whatwg] pattern attribute
ian at hixie.ch
Sat Aug 21 04:39:27 PDT 2004
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Wrigley, Ave wrote:
> 1. What is the motivation behind the implicit ^ and $ (start and end of
> string metacharacters)? I appreciate that in a lot of cases it makes it
> easier for people to implicitly match the whole string, but (as is
> mentioned in a sidebar) it make it potentially much more complex for
> people who want to match substrings (especially where newlines are
> possible). Would it be better just to comply with the ECMA-262 spec?
I just added a note to the document that says:
| The implicit ^ and $ characters are inserted because it is expected
| that the overwhelming majority of use cases will be to require that
| user input exactly match the given pattern. Authors who forget that
| these characters are implied will immediately realise their mistake
| during testing. Had the characters not been implied, requiring most
| authors to insert them themselves, it is likely that authors who
| forgot them would not catch their mistake as easily.
> 2. Also (not wishing to compicate things too much!) did you consider
> supporting regex modifiers (I guess case insensitivity would be
> particularly useful)?
I considered it but I couldn't really see an easy way to do it. If JS
supported perl's scoped modifiers, that would work, but I don't think
> 3. Finally, is it necessary to have an ERROR_ for invalid regexes
No, if the regexp is invalid, it is just ignored.
> I guess the real point of 1 is consistency, and the expectation that the
> input control will do what you expect. For example - I would expect that
> able to use the same regex pattern that I am using to validate an imput
> field in the script.
Most of the time you would, unless your pattern was specifically a
substring search pattern, which seems unlikely.
Thanks for your input!
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg