[whatwg] a few comments to Webforms 2.0 Call For Comments
ian at hixie.ch
Sun Aug 22 05:04:59 PDT 2004
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Olav Junker [iso-8859-1] Kjær wrote:
> And section 7.5 says:
> "The new pattern, required, autocomplete, autofocus, inputmode, min, max,
> wrap, disabled, action, enctype, method and replace attributes simply
> reflect the current value of their relevant content attribute."
> So I would think that min/max/step DOM properties should be null when
> not declared in the HTML, and that the validation code should use a
> hardcoded default value in that case. This default value will not be
> exposed by the DOM, then.
To clarify this I've added:
"If the attribute is not specified or has an invalid value, then the DOM
attribute reflects the default value."
> (The step attribute is left out of the quoted paragraph, however I
> assume that is just an oversight?)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg