[whatwg] Syntax Highlighting [was: several messages]
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Dec 16 14:30:41 PST 2004
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> > >>
> > >> http://whatwg.org/charter#crec
> > >>
> > >> ...which has an even more strictly-defined process for exiting the
> > >> call for implementations stage than the W3C does.
> > >
> > > Yeah, you never finished answering my questions about that, about
> > > exactly what a feature was etc.
> > It is defined right there in the charter.
> Nope, all that says is subsection or section, I asked, and got no answer
> about what that means, does each section, e.g. "section 3" requier 2
> interopable implementations, or does it just mean each subsection say
> sub-section 3.4 needs 2 interopable implementations.
Depends, on a case by case basis. Obviously some subsections can't be
tested separately, in which case sections are what matter. When
subsections are independent of other subsections, they can be tested
individually and then subsections are what matters.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg