[whatwg] WF 2.0 range type description
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Dec 16 18:23:11 PST 2004
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Brad Fults wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:45:37 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > Well, min max and step apply to all those types, I didn't really want
> > to have to explicitly mention them each time, so only mention them
> > where they are mildly important. Would it be better to explicitly
> > mention them for each different type?
> I understand the preference against mentioning them every time, but I
> think mentioning them after the fact makes it confusing. Maybe I missed
> something, but I didn't see the association until after reading the
> descriptions of each of the types and several more paragraphs after.
> It might be better to mention the shared attributes in a single place
> before all of the type descriptions, so the reader goes in with
> knowledge of the associations.
Ok, added a paragraph to that effect.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg