[whatwg] Seperation of Content and Interface

Jim Ley jim.ley at gmail.com
Sun Jul 11 14:14:58 PDT 2004

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:52:23 -0400, Joshua Wise <joshua at joshuawise.com> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On Sunday 11 July 2004 4:47 pm, Jim Ley wrote:
> > Sure you could, but there's no point building another layer into your
> > application, unless there are very powerful arguments for it - if
> > you're building websites, then you might as well use it directly 
> No, no... I was referring to the idea of somebody building a public proxy for
> this sort of thing. Rendering into a rendering language, as it were.

Still doesn't work, what's my motivation for using it?  my site will
be slower, and will be dependant on a 3rd party service, that just
doesn't make sense.

Also proxies run into problemes with the legal people.

<URL: http://jibbering.com/blog/index.php?p=137 >



More information about the whatwg mailing list