[whatwg] substantive comment on Web Forms 2.0, and suggestion
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Jul 12 13:23:55 PDT 2004
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> This is not the aim of Web Forms 2.0 (I'm not 100% sure what it is,
The aim of Web Forms 2.0 (and other WHATWG specs) is to extend HTML and
its supporting technologies to give authors what they want.
> other than lets hurt IE's market share)
Hurting IE's market share is not one of the aims of WHATWG. (I really
don't see how new technologies could possibly do that.)
> I think it's a good idea for the WF2 clients to report back what version
> of Web Forms they support.
This has the same problems as I described for <ignore>.
> How about we require CC/PP with an appropriate vocabulary for the WHATWG
> for this?
CC/PP is, IMHO, backwards. The whole point of having device-independent,
backwards-compatible languages is that you can use the same content
everywhere. CC/PP encourages device-specific authoring at the content
layer, which is bad for accessibility (only popular devices end up being
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg