[whatwg] type="datetime" demo
ian at hixie.ch
Thu Jul 15 08:11:04 PDT 2004
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> My UA is irrelevant, any competent scripter uses some same basic
> techniques, none of which were prevalent in the example. If you can't
> see that that will fail in lots of UA's, you simply shouldn't be
As far as I can tell, the script in the page in question is fully ECMA-262
compliant, and the DOM is fully W3C DOM2 HTML compliant.
If the script errors, it's a UA bug. I would like to know which UA that
is, but if you are unwilling to divulge this information, then I'm sure
I'll manage to get over my disappointment.
I read this document but was unable to find anything relevant. Could you
point me to the specific entry you were presumably referring to?
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg