[whatwg] Re: Seperation of Content and Interface

[Malcolm Rowe]

Jim Ley writes:
>> XHTML is in fact a very good example. XHTML1 and HTML4 are almost
>> identical. Why have virtually no authors switched to XHTML?
> because virtually identical and not supported by browsers provides no
> motivation to change, exactly the same challenges as WF2 has.

Except that WF2 provides an noticable improvement to HTML4, is backward 
compatible with HTML4, and will be well-supported by browsers. 

So, actually, nothing like XHTML. 

Regards,
Malcolm