[whatwg] Re: OT: XHTML as text/html

[Pete Harlow]

fantasai wrote:
> Pete Harlow wrote:
> 
>>
>> Another for the record:
>>
>> I wrote www.catnip.co.uk in validated XHTML 1.0 served text/html, and 
>> as far as I know it renders OK in most browsers. I had more trouble 
>> with CSS breaking NS4.
> 
> 
> Read http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
> 
> (You should know that "renders ok in most browsers" != "is correct markup"
> already.)

Oh, but only too true. I said validated XHTML, as in the w3c's 
validator. It was getting it to validate, and also render ok in most 
browsers, that was the PITA. I wouldn't post anything that didn't go 
through the w3c's validator - now whether *that* is sound policy...

Regards,

Pete.


-- 



This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, 
copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, 
and may be unlawful. 
If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete 
this message. Thales, its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.