[whatwg] a few comments to Webforms 2.0 Call For Comments
Matthew Thomas
mpt at myrealbox.com
Fri Jul 30 17:58:06 PDT 2004
On 31 Jul, 2004, at 7:00 AM, Matthew Raymond wrote:
> ...
> I recommend that, for HTML documents with the W2 doctype, there
> should always be a default option selected, regardless if that default
> is specified. Therefore, if none of the radio buttons are set, the
> first radio button in the group would automatically be set. If WF2
> isn't specified as the doctype, we'll default to HTML 4.01 behavior,
> even if WF2 markup is used. The WF2 spec should recommend the use of a
> radio button "Not Specified" for a default value if the user does not
> wish to select an option.
I like that idea. It seems like a good way of getting out of the
backward compatibility hole
<http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-June/
000386.html>.
(In general, expecting all controls to have an indeterminate state is
unreasonable -- see the second half of
<http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2004-July/
001044.html>. If you need to enforce attention that badly, you're
better to default to an unacceptable value, e.g. <option>I have not
made a choice yet</option>.)
--
Matthew Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
More information about the whatwg
mailing list