[whatwg] about rich internat applications
dean at edwards.name
Mon Jun 7 21:26:17 PDT 2004
Didier PH Martin wrote:
> Here are the choices:
> a) Implement something totally new in Mozilla and let it be alone in the
> woods to support its new feature.
> b) Embrace and expand. Implement behaviors in Mozilla and let people create
> components on both Mozilla and IE.
thanks for starting this discussion didier.
dhtml behaviors and xbl aren't a million miles apart. basically they
define extensions to existing elements. they also contain a bunch of
code to implement these extensions. the only thing that is different is
the markup. i've successfully ported microsoft dhtml behaviors to
mozilla without conversion:
it is possible to do the reverse. it would be possible to define any
components required by web forms in xbl. then transform them (possibly
xslt) to dhtml behaviors. it would require a certain amount of
discipline on behalf of the developer but the benefits are huge. one
code set to maintain. another advantage is that the *actual* source code
exists in xbl (an open source technology). this is probably easier said
than done but it is definitely very doable.
ps is an *internat* caught in the world wide web??
More information about the whatwg