[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 comments
fantasai
fantasai.lists at inkedblade.net
Thu Jun 10 13:01:30 PDT 2004
Sander wrote:
> I therefore propose extending the precision attribute as currently
> specified by also allowing a numerical value, any numerical value,
> which would act as a "step" between possible numerical values to be
> selected by the element.
I agree with this.
> Sideways related to this extension to precision, I have started
> questioning the "range" input type. How would this act (aka, display)
> without "min" and "max" values?
That's a good point.
> The semantic value of this element seems dubious, with it seemingly
> being included merely to force "display: slider" on an element
The semantic difference between 'number' and 'range' is, as the spec says,
that 'range' "indicates that the exact value is not important". For a
number, the exact value the user is entering must be displayed. For a
range, a slider with a coarse number line is sufficient.
> I propose dropping range and perhaps instead recommending that (lacking
> styling hints to the contrary) user agents display all type="number"
> input elements, with min and max values less than x steps apart, as
> 'sliders'.
A typical UI for a number is a "spinner" widget, not a slider.
That's the one that has little up/down arrows alongside a short
text input.
http://www.osc.edu/~jbryan/FLU/images/Flu_Spinner_Try.gif
> On which subject: Hixie, are you interested in editorial comments on the
> Web Forms draft yet, or is it still too early for that?
I've got a full printout marked up with them. How about waiting until
I'm through before doing your pass? :)
~fantasai
--
http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
More information about the whatwg
mailing list