[whatwg] RE: Degrading of web applications
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Nov 16 18:29:31 PST 2004
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:00:33 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> > > > If application providers consider that compatibility with non-JS
> > > > browsers (and browsers with JS disabled) is not critical, then
> > > > that is an important datapoint.
> > >
> > > It is, unfortunately, it's also something that won't fly in the
> > > application world of the EU, where anti-discrimination employment
> > > laws will cripple any attempt to have this fly - I realise as a non
> > > EU national and an employee of a non-EU corporation you may not
> > > realise this, but the EU market is too important to web-applications
> > > to the most of us to consider anything we can't use in that
> > > environment.
> >
> > Could you give me a reference to this EU law that says that requiring
> > JavaScript support is illegal but requiring HTML support is not?
>
> You're confusing things, you're confusing the availability of suitable
> access technology that supports scripting with the theoretical concept
> that such AT exists. It doesn't, so given that fact, so as to not
> discriminate against our employees (or potential ones of course) with
> disabilities, our intranet sites have to work with the relevant Access
> Technology, unfortunately this currently limits what we can do, and
> requiring javascript is not there.
But no ATs support any of the WHATWG stuff either, so if you have to
target existing ATs, everything being discussed is out of scope.
> http://www.disability.gov.uk/legislation/
Thanks for the link.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list