[whatwg] New suggestion for mutually exclusive sections in WF2
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Nov 22 16:46:35 PST 2004
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, dolphinling wrote:
> This suggestion is for an attribute, which I shall call qwe since I
> can't come up with a good name, which can be applied to a fieldset.
> This attribute is similar to the form attribute--it's value must be the
> value of the id of an input of type checkbox or radio which the
> fieldset is associated with.
> If that checkbox or radio button is checked, the fieldset is not
> disabled. If the checkbox or radio button is not checked, the fieldset
> is disabled.
That's a pretty good idea. I was also considering making the "disabled"
attribute take an expression of sorts (or just an ID) along the lines of
the "relevant" attribute in XForms, which is more powerful but also more
likely to have compatibility issues.
I've noted this your for Web Forms 3. I'm trying to keep the new additions
to WF2 to a minimum for now. :-)
(You can see other ideas that are noted for WF3 by looking at the comment
hidden at the end of the spec markup.)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg