[whatwg] RE: Degrading of web applications

Jim Ley jim.ley at gmail.com
Thu Sep 9 00:14:47 PDT 2004

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:09:39 +0930, Chris Were <chris.were at gmail.com> wrote:
>>what you don't explain though is why that
>> model requires no degradation - what's the difference?
> Are you refering to future or past degradation? The model I mentioned
> doesn't require past degradation, but the future WHATWG specification
> definately requires degradation to continue supporting what is
> currently possible.

could you explain more what you mean by future and past degradation? 
This hasn't really made anything clear I'm afraid, but I think you're
probably right that we're talking at crossed purposes..


More information about the whatwg mailing list