[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0
Joe Gregorio
joe.gregorio at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 17:27:13 PDT 2005
On Apr 5, 2005 6:50 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Joe Gregorio wrote:
>
> > In the Web Forms 2.0 Working Draft dated 16 March 2005
> >
> > 5.6. Submitting the encoded form data set
> >
> > "If the specified method is not one of get, post,
> > put, or delete then it is treated as get in the tables below."
> >
> > It would be much better if just one word of that sentence was changed:
> >
> > "If the specified method is not one of get, post,
> > put, or delete then it is treated as *post* in the tables below."
>
> I agree. Sadly, doing this would break compatibility with existing
> implementations, which all treat unknown values as "get".
Would that really 'break' anything? If that is the default behaviour today
then clients would expect not to be able to send a request body with a
method outside POST and PUT. Adding that capability won't break their
code, will it?
Thanks,
-joe
--
Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
More information about the whatwg
mailing list