[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Apr 5 17:36:53 PDT 2005
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Joe Gregorio wrote:
> > >
> > > "If the specified method is not one of get, post,
> > > put, or delete then it is treated as *post* in the tables
> > > below."
> > I agree. Sadly, doing this would break compatibility with existing
> > implementations, which all treat unknown values as "get".
> Would that really 'break' anything? If that is the default behaviour
> today then clients would expect not to be able to send a request body
> with a method outside POST and PUT. Adding that capability won't break
> their code, will it?
If anyone has a form that says:
...then at the moment it'll be treated as GET. If you change the default
to "post", it'll no longer be treated as GET.
I really don't feel comfortable changing things that all browsers do. If
all the browsers interoperate on something, we should celebrate that thing
and leave it well alone... It's so rare...
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg