[whatwg] HTML5: New link-types regarding guideline 2.4 in WCAG 2.0
lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au
Tue Apr 12 19:06:31 PDT 2005
Henrik Lied wrote:
> In one of the comments in that post, it was proposed to use the LINK
> element with a REL attribute which relates to the different sections of
> the site.
> NAVIGATION Relates to the main site-navigation
> CONTENT Relates to the head of content
> ADDITIONAL Relates to an additional section, e.g.
> a sidebar
> DISCLAIMER Relates to the copyright-notice/legal
Hmm, interesting. They seem like more specific versions of rel="bookmark":
"A bookmark is a link to a key entry point within an extended
Although, that definition is somewhat ambiguious, as HTML4 doesn't seem
to define the meaning of "extended document".
Anyway, while on the topic of link types, what does everyone think of
these "web communication link relationships"  that I worked on a few
months ago? It includes relationships like: permalink, feed, via,
related, referral, pingback (borrowed from Pingback 1.0), trackback,
etc. Could some of these be improved and included within web apps?
http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web
http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox
More information about the whatwg