Call four comments 4 is out (Was: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 submission to W3C)
jim.ley at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 01:09:22 PDT 2005
On 4/12/05, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> 2. Providing comprehensive use cases and requirements. This doesn't really
> belong in a spec, so I don't think we should change the spec to include
Then please publish a seperate requirements document that does list
them. I'm sure the WHAT-WG must have the resources to simply write up
something which you now claim to be "listed in detail". I've asked
repeatedly on the list before, and all I've been told is that the use
cases were in the un-archived part of the work before the mailing list
was formed. I can't find the use cases on the list, so please provide
another document, or at the very least, point to them.
Without use cases, we can't review the spec, because we don't know
what you're trying to solve.
More information about the whatwg