[whatwg] Re: HTTP 205 response
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Apr 25 16:23:11 PDT 2005
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> Step 8 at http://whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/current-work/#form-submission
> doesn't seem particularly well-defined to me. In particular,
>
> 1) There is no definition of the term "form" here (if there is one
> elsewhere in the specification, please link to it). Would a form in
> a Flash plugin be considered a form? What about XForms? What about
> other languages (eg XUL) defining HTML-form-like semantics?
Changed to specifically refer to <form> elements.
> 2) It's not clear to me why simply resetting forms to their current
> defaultValues (as opposed to their initial defaultValues) follows
> the HTTP specification being cited
Changed to say that the requirement in WF2 is based on the HTTP one, but
that the HTTP one is vague.
> See also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198309 for some
> discussion on the issue.
Did you have any specific comments in mind?
Thanks for your input, I have updated the spec accordingly. Please let me
know if there's anything that could be improved.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list