[whatwg] Link to dated version of HTML 4.01, not latest

[Anne van Kesteren]

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> 
>> I think Web Forms 2 should refer to a dated version of HTML 4.01 
>> (for example section 2.13), not to the latest version since there 
>> is a very small chance that the definition might change eventually.
>
> Why wouldn't we want WF2 to track changes in HTML4?

Because the draft someone implements might not be stable in such cases.

Once HTML4 updates, WF2 could get an update of its own and match the 
changes in other drafts.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>