[whatwg] Use IRI instead of URI
Anne van Kesteren
fora at annevankesteren.nl
Thu Feb 3 09:42:48 PST 2005
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> Since IRI is now a RFC, shouldn't Web Forms use that term instead
>> of URI?
>>
>> (For example, in section 2.12. I guess once UAs start supporting
>> IRIs you want a list of IRIs there, not just URIs.)
>
> I've already updated all the cases that really matter. For the most
> part I'd like to just stick to calling things URIs since otherwise
> people will just get more and more confused (most people still think
> they're URLs...).
Does that matter for a specification?
If you do it, you might want to add a line somewhere that URI and IRI
are used interchangeable.
Also, I think WF2 should refer to RFC3986 instead of RFC1738 since the
former updates the latter. RFC3986 is an internet standard and obsoletes
various other documents as well.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list