[whatwg] [WA1] Markup for vCalendar and vCard
mattraymond at earthlink.net
Tue Feb 22 07:54:33 PST 2005
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Matthew Raymond wrote:
>>There are several problems with hCalendar (and in turn, vCard): [...]
> Tantek has asked me to point people to:
I appreciate his quick response to my email.
> Please discuss hCalendar and hCard issues with Tantek;
Why? I have no intention of developing a Calendar/Card system for
HTML5 outside of a public forum, and the Wikis are outside of my
control. (Not that I question Tantek's integrity and dedication to
standards. I just think it's a poor precedent to redirect conversations
about WHATWG specifications to area's outside the control of WHATWG.)
Furthermore, if you haven't noticed with some of Jim Ley's messages,
there would be questions about fairness and tampering with the Wiki even
if everything was on the up-and-up.
> I'm not planning on
> touching the relevant sections of WA1 until Tantek's drafts are much more
Why are we holding up the Calendar/Card portion of WA1 based
entirely on the work of a single individual who is not a member of
WHATWG? Granted, he's vastly more qualified than I am, but with regards
to the WHATWG charter, he has no more authority than I do. Are we going
to start carving up WHATWG specs and handing out pieces to specific
individuals outside of the WHATWG for them to control?!? If someone who
worked on Browser-X comes up with a menu system for WA1, do we just put
everything on hold until he finishes that draft?!? Can't wait 'til Jim
replies to this one!
> Unless there are good reasons not to do so, I plan to just take
> his specs wholesale (either by reference or by inclusion), when they are
> ready. There's not really any point in several different versions of these
> things being done at the same time!
Excuse me? There will always be several versions. It's called a
difference of opinion. The whole point is to debate who's opinion is
more valid until a clear, well-thought-out decision can be made. If you
don't have that, then you have a specification developed by one, and
WHATWG will quickly loose legitimacy.
Might I also point out that the wikis you posted URLs to have NO
COPYRIGHT NOTICES, NO OBVIOUS LINKS TO A COPYRIGHT POLICY and NO
COPYRIGHT METADATA, and that the domain is that of THE COMPANY
TECHNORATI. Who's to say his company won't just turn around and claim
copyrights and patents to the whole mess?
If you and Tantek want hCalendar and hCard as part of a WHATWG
specification, you should post material here and allow people to comment
on it publicly. A specific solution should not get special treatment
regardless of who came up with it. I wouldn't mind seeing Tantek as a
member of WHATWG personally, but freezing a portion of the spec so that
a single individual can work on it completely outside of this working
group is just wrong.
P.S.: I will be directing all my comments and ideas with regards to
Calendar/Card markup to this mailing list only. I invite Tantek to do
More information about the whatwg