[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Implementation choices
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Jan 10 06:41:31 PST 2005
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Jep Castelein wrote:
> It's probably too early to discuss implementation in detail, but it
> seems to me that the specs are biased towards native browser
> implementations. How does the list think about implementations in a
> of course without the DOM interface extensions. This would also avoid
> library that integrates seamlessly with existing HTML pages and existing
> browser implementations (including IE)
> Is the Web Forms 2.0 specification intended to support this type of
> implementation, or is it focused purely on native browser
Web Forms 2.0 is not written with a pure JS implementation in mind, but if
there are small changes that could be made to the spec today to make doing
such an implementation easier, let me know. The primary target for WF2 and
WA1 is native implementations and XBL- and HTC- based implementations.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg