[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Implementation choices
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Jan 21 04:47:07 PST 2005
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Jim Ley wrote:
> > Not a very big deal IMHO, I don't think hasFeature really works anyway.
> It doesn't, can we please not bother with it?
I'd be more than happy to drop hasFeature(), but I've been asked to have
it by DOM people. It probably won't do any harm. (FWIW, the spec says
basically any UA can return true; it's not a test of conformance, but of
intention. As you say, you wouldn't be able to test conformance.)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg